For more than 100 years, marketers have largely focused on reaching stakeholders through push, e.g. paid and earned media. Now, however, in an age when Google dominates, it’s equally important that we turn our attention toward digital discoverability. This requires that brands create relevant content that people will “pull” through search engines and social networks.
Call it whatever you want, but Digital Discovery is just a fancy name for SEO.
I like Steve Rubel and find his blog posts informative and often thought-provoking. So why exactly is he carefully sidestepping the true craft of Search Engine Optimization? Why not call linkbait ... linkbait? And is this actually a trend for 2009? The 'SEO for Press Releases' session is a golden oldie on the search conference circuit.
So perhaps it's the audience of public relations professionals who are late in adopting SEO that shaped the report? Do they view SEO as snake oil? That we're all a bunch of hucksters? There are bad SEOs and good SEOs, just like you'll find good PR flaks and bad PR flaks. It doesn't mean that I begin to call public relations something like 'brand maximization'.
It irks me. Steve is a respected voice in his industry and beyond. This was a missed opportunity to help change the perception of SEO.