<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Domain Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=single-domain-results</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Need To Understand Google's Obsession With Time To Long Click</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-11578</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Need To Understand Google's Obsession With Time To Long Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-11578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For a while I just thought this was Google being stupid. But then it dawned on me. The lack of domain diversity may be reducing the time to long click. It might actually be improving the overall satisfaction metrics Google uses to optimize search! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a while I just thought this was Google being stupid. But then it dawned on me. The lack of domain diversity may be reducing the time to long click. It might actually be improving the overall satisfaction metrics Google uses to optimize search! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-5965</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-5965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, forgot to add.. great post as always.. thanks.. also I wanted to mention on the subject of sitelinks.. ive noticed that Google seems to have a trends towards more and more new types of site links, I expect to see Google testing more types of new styles of site links in 2012. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, forgot to add.. great post as always.. thanks.. also I wanted to mention on the subject of sitelinks.. ive noticed that Google seems to have a trends towards more and more new types of site links, I expect to see Google testing more types of new styles of site links in 2012. <img src='http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-5964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even thought there are a few dupe results, in the site links, it should be up to the SEO team for Oakley to remove the dupe entries in GWT, this would give them more shelf space in Google. IMHO, (And i&#039;ll admit I have a large big brand bias towards this) The extra brand bias makes a lot of sense for Google to display the results the way they do above as it keeps more of the brand at the top vs. potential foakley (fake oakley) sites popping up. Not that there are any faokleys on page one.. but this is a good safe measure don&#039;t you think? Where this get&#039;s interesting to your point, is where Google draws the line between brands that have brand names that are also nonbrand words. It really just makes it harder for some brands than others... so this is a good lesson for people to consider SEO when they pick the name of their company or website ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even thought there are a few dupe results, in the site links, it should be up to the SEO team for Oakley to remove the dupe entries in GWT, this would give them more shelf space in Google. IMHO, (And i&#8217;ll admit I have a large big brand bias towards this) The extra brand bias makes a lot of sense for Google to display the results the way they do above as it keeps more of the brand at the top vs. potential foakley (fake oakley) sites popping up. Not that there are any faokleys on page one.. but this is a good safe measure don&#8217;t you think? Where this get&#8217;s interesting to your point, is where Google draws the line between brands that have brand names that are also nonbrand words. It really just makes it harder for some brands than others&#8230; so this is a good lesson for people to consider SEO when they pick the name of their company or website <img src='http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-5963</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-5963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve certainly been seen a lot more of such &quot;single domain&quot; results in Google&#039;s SERPs these days - and, as you say, the indented result has disappeared.

Sitelinks have certainly increased - and an important change in this regard is that that site subsections are now regularly producing sitelinks (that is, sitelinks are appearing areas of a specific domain or subdomain, rather than only for a top-level domain-focused query, or results relevant to a subdomain - try out &quot;new york times sports&quot; to see what I mean).

Interestingly - as per most of your examples - such a stack of results from the same domain tend to be in response to entity-related queries (which, in the context of companies on the web, can also be loosely classified as &quot;brand queries&quot;).  Entity-focused results seem to be the area Google is tinkering most with these days, and as you note, they haven&#039;t quite nailed it yet.

Given that such type of queries will continue to be a focus for Google, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if we see a return to something like indented queries, though in a different visual form.  That is, a user interface that groups domain-specific results for such queries, but for results in addition to those which currently generate sitelinks for the first result.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve certainly been seen a lot more of such &#8220;single domain&#8221; results in Google&#8217;s SERPs these days &#8211; and, as you say, the indented result has disappeared.</p>
<p>Sitelinks have certainly increased &#8211; and an important change in this regard is that that site subsections are now regularly producing sitelinks (that is, sitelinks are appearing areas of a specific domain or subdomain, rather than only for a top-level domain-focused query, or results relevant to a subdomain &#8211; try out &#8220;new york times sports&#8221; to see what I mean).</p>
<p>Interestingly &#8211; as per most of your examples &#8211; such a stack of results from the same domain tend to be in response to entity-related queries (which, in the context of companies on the web, can also be loosely classified as &#8220;brand queries&#8221;).  Entity-focused results seem to be the area Google is tinkering most with these days, and as you note, they haven&#8217;t quite nailed it yet.</p>
<p>Given that such type of queries will continue to be a focus for Google, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if we see a return to something like indented queries, though in a different visual form.  That is, a user interface that groups domain-specific results for such queries, but for results in addition to those which currently generate sitelinks for the first result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-5915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch! How did I miss that one? Thanks Melanie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! How did I miss that one? Thanks Melanie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/single-domain-results#comment-5913</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=6315#comment-5913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[visual cue, not queue :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>visual cue, not queue <img src='http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.blindfiveyearold.com @ 2013-05-23 17:36:39 by W3 Total Cache -->