<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO 101: Dashes or Underscores?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seo-dashes-or-underscores</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dashes vs Underscores for SEO &#124; CSS Button</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Dashes vs Underscores for SEO &#124; CSS Button</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>[...] What are your thoughts? (More info) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What are your thoughts? (More info) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-541</guid>
		<description>So what about the total number of dashes in a URL.  I&#039;ve heard that having 5 or more dashes in the URL is bad for SEO.  Anyone have any information about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about the total number of dashes in a URL.  I&#8217;ve heard that having 5 or more dashes in the URL is bad for SEO.  Anyone have any information about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO link #2</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO link #2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggi l&#8217;articolo completo su Blind Five Year Old. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leggi l&#8217;articolo completo su Blind Five Year Old. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffalo SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalo SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Dashes all the way.  Consider underscores to create a visual for people browsing the search results without adding weight to the words in the URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dashes all the way.  Consider underscores to create a visual for people browsing the search results without adding weight to the words in the URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m a fan of dashes... because it&#039;s easier to read, if the underscore is a link (as many URL&#039;s become) then it&#039;s difficult to see what is an underscore, space or link.  But I do believe that Google have done a great job with word stemming so it shouldn&#039;t make too much of a difference at this time.

But for so many reasons I&#039;ll agree... USE DASHES!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m a fan of dashes&#8230; because it&#8217;s easier to read, if the underscore is a link (as many URL&#8217;s become) then it&#8217;s difficult to see what is an underscore, space or link.  But I do believe that Google have done a great job with word stemming so it shouldn&#8217;t make too much of a difference at this time.</p>
<p>But for so many reasons I&#8217;ll agree&#8230; USE DASHES!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dror Zaifman</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-dashes-or-underscores#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dror Zaifman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=1057#comment-379</guid>
		<description>I tend to use dashes as well as I noticed that is what Google uses on their blogger service when someone puts up a blog with multiple words.
The resulting link is something like this 

name of blog within blogger/year it was published/month it was published/e-commerce-website-101.html
Until I see Google changes I am sticking to what they use in their architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to use dashes as well as I noticed that is what Google uses on their blogger service when someone puts up a blog with multiple words.<br />
The resulting link is something like this </p>
<p>name of blog within blogger/year it was published/month it was published/e-commerce-website-101.html<br />
Until I see Google changes I am sticking to what they use in their architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

