<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Freeloaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=search-volume-trends</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: US Desktop Search Volume Declines For The First Time</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-8310</link>
		<dc:creator>US Desktop Search Volume Declines For The First Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-8310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I won&#8217;t repeat those here (but go and read it &#8230; now). However, I think they did make a lot of SEOs look better than they were, helped Google rise to prominence and will make Facebook&#8217;s post IPO prospects far less [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I won&#8217;t repeat those here (but go and read it &#8230; now). However, I think they did make a lot of SEOs look better than they were, helped Google rise to prominence and will make Facebook&#8217;s post IPO prospects far less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Search Trends To Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Search Trends To Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rate of growth has slowed dramatically and 2011 is tracking toward single digit growth. I&#8217;ve written before about how this may create a shakeout within the SEO community. You can&#8217;t just show up, half-ass the job, and still wind up catching that huge wave of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rate of growth has slowed dramatically and 2011 is tracking toward single digit growth. I&#8217;ve written before about how this may create a shakeout within the SEO community. You can&#8217;t just show up, half-ass the job, and still wind up catching that huge wave of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick,

The technology and gadget space is saturated, so even if this &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt; a well curated site, it winds up looking generic. The screenshot is &lt;em&gt;hilarious&lt;/em&gt;, but shows that they&#039;re probably not doing a lot of due diligence but instead are simply reporting on their own anecdotal keyword traffic findings. Oddly, if you trust Alexa&#039;s Clickstream numbers, they rely on Google (and not Bing) for most of their search traffic. 

I agree, the rising reliance on content (and user experience) makes the synergy between SEO and other parts of an organization more critical than ever. Yet, the public flogging SEO is taking from mainstream media, the Internati &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; other search engines creates a difficult landscape to make those connections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>The technology and gadget space is saturated, so even if this <em>were</em> a well curated site, it winds up looking generic. The screenshot is <em>hilarious</em>, but shows that they&#8217;re probably not doing a lot of due diligence but instead are simply reporting on their own anecdotal keyword traffic findings. Oddly, if you trust Alexa&#8217;s Clickstream numbers, they rely on Google (and not Bing) for most of their search traffic. </p>
<p>I agree, the rising reliance on content (and user experience) makes the synergy between SEO and other parts of an organization more critical than ever. Yet, the public flogging SEO is taking from mainstream media, the Internati <em>and</em> other search engines creates a difficult landscape to make those connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 22:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AJ-

Here&#039;s the example I tweeted to you earlier: http://bit.ly/lnorzm

The site is conspicuously like about 10,000+ other tech sites covering the latest and greatest gadgets.  Even if the content is 100% original, is there a value add to have the site in the index?  Sounds harsh but when I put my &quot;blind five year old&quot; glasses on, this site looks like hundreds of others and the algo probably thinks so too. 

I find it amusing that they promote the Bing angle as a better alternative only to offer a screenshot of their own site in the results as evidence.  Nothing like objectivity.

At the end of the day, I can build a solid site structurally but often have little say in the content that goes on the page.  That content now weighs more heavily than ever.  It&#039;s disconcerting to know that SEO success now depends heavily on parts of an organization that might mistrust our efforts.

Time to do more internal networking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ-</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the example I tweeted to you earlier: <a href="http://bit.ly/lnorzm" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/lnorzm</a></p>
<p>The site is conspicuously like about 10,000+ other tech sites covering the latest and greatest gadgets.  Even if the content is 100% original, is there a value add to have the site in the index?  Sounds harsh but when I put my &#8220;blind five year old&#8221; glasses on, this site looks like hundreds of others and the algo probably thinks so too. </p>
<p>I find it amusing that they promote the Bing angle as a better alternative only to offer a screenshot of their own site in the results as evidence.  Nothing like objectivity.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, I can build a solid site structurally but often have little say in the content that goes on the page.  That content now weighs more heavily than ever.  It&#8217;s disconcerting to know that SEO success now depends heavily on parts of an organization that might mistrust our efforts.</p>
<p>Time to do more internal networking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 20:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alan.

I &lt;em&gt;hope&lt;/em&gt; it forces those who &#039;claim&#039; to offer SEO to move on to something else. Moving the needle will become more difficult in the next couple of years. Unfortunately, that may push many to resort to more gray and black hat tactics. I anticipate a bumpy ride, but believe the industry will &lt;em&gt;finally&lt;/em&gt; emerge stronger as a result.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alan.</p>
<p>I <em>hope</em> it forces those who &#8216;claim&#8217; to offer SEO to move on to something else. Moving the needle will become more difficult in the next couple of years. Unfortunately, that may push many to resort to more gray and black hat tactics. I anticipate a bumpy ride, but believe the industry will <em>finally</em> emerge stronger as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick,

That&#039;s true, it would be interesting to track the number of sites during this time frame as well. There are&lt;strong&gt; a lot &lt;/strong&gt;of sites out there now and the oil from those &lt;del datetime=&quot;2011-05-13T20:44:26+00:00&quot;&gt;fields&lt;/del&gt; SERPs is about to run dry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s true, it would be interesting to track the number of sites during this time frame as well. There are<strong> a lot </strong>of sites out there now and the oil from those <del datetime="2011-05-13T20:44:26+00:00">fields</del> SERPs is about to run dry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great insight.  It&#039;s going to lead to many who currently claim they offer SEO to have no ability to sustain long term.  They&#039;ll have three choices - get out of SEO, actually ramp up knowledge, or opt to find the &quot;easy&quot; path by learning to game the results system.  

The next couple years should prove quite interesting indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great insight.  It&#8217;s going to lead to many who currently claim they offer SEO to have no ability to sustain long term.  They&#8217;ll have three choices &#8211; get out of SEO, actually ramp up knowledge, or opt to find the &#8220;easy&#8221; path by learning to game the results system.  </p>
<p>The next couple years should prove quite interesting indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-volume-trends#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=4154#comment-2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What people seem to fail to realize (not you necessarily:) is that during this time there has been a major daily influx of new sites competing for the same search resources.  

Law of supply and demand, we have an oversupply of results, a squeeze from local search results displaying Google Places and a dwindling demand (searches).

Yes, there will be pain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What people seem to fail to realize (not you necessarily:) is that during this time there has been a major daily influx of new sites competing for the same search resources.  </p>
<p>Law of supply and demand, we have an oversupply of results, a squeeze from local search results displaying Google Places and a dwindling demand (searches).</p>
<p>Yes, there will be pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.452 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-19 07:35:12 -->
