<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SEM 101: Phrase Match and Exact Match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aidy78</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidy78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>Reply to Col,

Having different match types for the same KP is a good idea.

You have red balloons on exact match and phrase match. User types in red balloons - if it is cheaper on a phrase match option then google will use the phrase match KP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to Col,</p>
<p>Having different match types for the same KP is a good idea.</p>
<p>You have red balloons on exact match and phrase match. User types in red balloons &#8211; if it is cheaper on a phrase match option then google will use the phrase match KP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinod Mohite</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinod Mohite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-3771</guid>
		<description>Nice Article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What’s the difference between broad match, phrase match and exact match in Google search results?? &#124; &#124; Internet marketing, SEO marketing, web design, network marketing, affiliate marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>What’s the difference between broad match, phrase match and exact match in Google search results?? &#124; &#124; Internet marketing, SEO marketing, web design, network marketing, affiliate marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>[...] To read the full article about how to use exact match, phrase match, broad match for targeted search in Google  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To read the full article about how to use exact match, phrase match, broad match for targeted search in Google  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-3671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-3671</guid>
		<description>Very clear explanation of google keywords for exact match, phrase match and broad match.

I will create link to your web site. 
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very clear explanation of google keywords for exact match, phrase match and broad match.</p>
<p>I will create link to your web site.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A 10 minute guide to SEO and PPC for PR people &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>A 10 minute guide to SEO and PPC for PR people &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>[...] both on a global and a local basis. It breaks down figures based on broad, phrase or exact match (go here for an explanation). It is important to understand these distinctions. Too often I have seen PR people quoting broad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] both on a global and a local basis. It breaks down figures based on broad, phrase or exact match (go here for an explanation). It is important to understand these distinctions. Too often I have seen PR people quoting broad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>I found the post very helpful!  I am rather a newbie at Adwords, and I am responding to the question previous, from COL.  Thanks for &quot;phrasing&quot; it for me!  

I was wondering the same, as I just switched out a Campaign for what I thought was a better designed one, and one of the major switches was that I chose less keywords, but included broad, phrase and exact for each one.  

Now it&#039;s only been a few days so far but my traffic has dropped by more than half.  The CTR has risen slightly and I noticed I seem to be paying a higher CPC for the same keywords.  

If anyone has any experiences/insights with this I&#039;d love to hear about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the post very helpful!  I am rather a newbie at Adwords, and I am responding to the question previous, from COL.  Thanks for &#8220;phrasing&#8221; it for me!  </p>
<p>I was wondering the same, as I just switched out a Campaign for what I thought was a better designed one, and one of the major switches was that I chose less keywords, but included broad, phrase and exact for each one.  </p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s only been a few days so far but my traffic has dropped by more than half.  The CTR has risen slightly and I noticed I seem to be paying a higher CPC for the same keywords.  </p>
<p>If anyone has any experiences/insights with this I&#8217;d love to hear about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Col</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Col</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>Great post and the Excel tips were much appreciated!

Question for you - I was talking to an Adwords customer service representative from Google today (yes, I know...they actually exist! Think it&#039;s a new thing for setting up new campaigns).  Anyway, she advised NOT having the same keyphrase on multiple match types. I queried this and told her I had seen plenty of campaigns where this is the case but she insisted that it &quot;creates competition between the the two keyphrases for the bid&quot;. 

I pressed her on why this might be a bad thing but I didn&#039;t quite get the explanation. I think what she was implying was that you end up bidding against yourself and therefore costing yourself more money?  

Is this correct? Any thoughts on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and the Excel tips were much appreciated!</p>
<p>Question for you &#8211; I was talking to an Adwords customer service representative from Google today (yes, I know&#8230;they actually exist! Think it&#8217;s a new thing for setting up new campaigns).  Anyway, she advised NOT having the same keyphrase on multiple match types. I queried this and told her I had seen plenty of campaigns where this is the case but she insisted that it &#8220;creates competition between the the two keyphrases for the bid&#8221;. </p>
<p>I pressed her on why this might be a bad thing but I didn&#8217;t quite get the explanation. I think what she was implying was that you end up bidding against yourself and therefore costing yourself more money?  </p>
<p>Is this correct? Any thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Great article I found it very helpful, Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article I found it very helpful, Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike and yes the &amp; will essentially do the same thing. 

It&#039;s my understanding that you need the extra quotation marks since that&#039;s how you declare that it&#039;s a text string.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike and yes the &amp; will essentially do the same thing. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s my understanding that you need the extra quotation marks since that&#8217;s how you declare that it&#8217;s a text string.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-sem-101-phrase-match-and-exact-match#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=423#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>Cool - hadn&#039;t checked out the CONCATENATE formula before. There is also another method for doing the same - 

=&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&amp;$A2&amp;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;
and
=&quot;[&quot;&amp;$A2&amp;&quot;]&quot;

The cell value would read &quot;bird bath&quot; and [bird bath]

basically the &quot;&amp;&quot; allows you to insert additional cell content within your currently highlighted cell content. The additional quotation marks simply denotes that content within the quotation marks is text. Not sure why you need 4 quotation marks for the first example but hey it works..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool &#8211; hadn&#8217;t checked out the CONCATENATE formula before. There is also another method for doing the same &#8211; </p>
<p>=&#8221;"&#8221;"&amp;$A2&amp;&#8221;"&#8221;"<br />
and<br />
=&#8221;["&amp;$A2&amp;"]&#8221;</p>
<p>The cell value would read &#8220;bird bath&#8221; and [bird bath]</p>
<p>basically the &#8220;&amp;&#8221; allows you to insert additional cell content within your currently highlighted cell content. The additional quotation marks simply denotes that content within the quotation marks is text. Not sure why you need 4 quotation marks for the first example but hey it works..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

