<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Instant Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-instant-analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-instant-analysis?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-instant-analysis</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Impact of Google Instant &#124; Do you need to be above the fold? &#124; Blind Five Year Old</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-instant-analysis#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Impact of Google Instant &#124; Do you need to be above the fold? &#124; Blind Five Year Old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=2729#comment-1118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been more interested in whether Google Instant would change assessment behavior. I theorized that Google Instant might result in more clicks above the fold because users would become focused [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been more interested in whether Google Instant would change assessment behavior. I theorized that Google Instant might result in more clicks above the fold because users would become focused [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-instant-analysis#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=2729#comment-1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice analysis of the implications of Google Instant. There has been a lot of talk about the likely effect on the long-tail, and I think you&#039;re spot on that it will depend on how searcher behaviour evolves..

Google point too about Autocomplete affecting when people stop typing. I think whether or not the long tail still has opportunity will ultimately come down to the range of search suggestions Google offer in their Autocomplete drop-down list. If people come to accept Google&#039;s search suggestions as finite, the number of creative / unique / ad hoc searches would steadily decline (already there is some evidence of this as I point out in an article on Google Instant I worte recently http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/discussion/the-laziness-of-google-instant ) 
 
If that is the case, I don&#039;t think the long-tail is necessarily dead, but it is certainly limited to some extent by the comprehensiveness of Google&#039;s search suggestions. 
 
On the other hand, if people take a completely different approach to Google Instant altogether, and instead increase their demands for even more specific, detailed results, as you pointy out, then the long-tail could in fact grow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis of the implications of Google Instant. There has been a lot of talk about the likely effect on the long-tail, and I think you&#8217;re spot on that it will depend on how searcher behaviour evolves..</p>
<p>Google point too about Autocomplete affecting when people stop typing. I think whether or not the long tail still has opportunity will ultimately come down to the range of search suggestions Google offer in their Autocomplete drop-down list. If people come to accept Google&#8217;s search suggestions as finite, the number of creative / unique / ad hoc searches would steadily decline (already there is some evidence of this as I point out in an article on Google Instant I worte recently <a href="http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/discussion/the-laziness-of-google-instant" rel="nofollow">http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/discussion/the-laziness-of-google-instant</a> ) </p>
<p>If that is the case, I don&#8217;t think the long-tail is necessarily dead, but it is certainly limited to some extent by the comprehensiveness of Google&#8217;s search suggestions. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if people take a completely different approach to Google Instant altogether, and instead increase their demands for even more specific, detailed results, as you pointy out, then the long-tail could in fact grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.blindfiveyearold.com @ 2013-05-22 14:25:58 by W3 Total Cache -->