<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Cached Pages Gone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-cached-pages-gone</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Max Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-8104</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-8104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is yet another blow to screenreader users, mostly visualy impaired comme moi.  The cached versions would smooth out some rough edges, but now it&#039;s hard to get to them.
You can left and right-click simulated mice with a screenreader but mouse-over is very tricky.  Why should I have to hover in order to discover?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is yet another blow to screenreader users, mostly visualy impaired comme moi.  The cached versions would smooth out some rough edges, but now it&#8217;s hard to get to them.<br />
You can left and right-click simulated mice with a screenreader but mouse-over is very tricky.  Why should I have to hover in order to discover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3612</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie,

Yes, I just reconfirmed it now. The cached pages are still there when you trigger the instant preview.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie,</p>
<p>Yes, I just reconfirmed it now. The cached pages are still there when you trigger the instant preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to use the new cached function but it didn&#039;t work.  Did you try using it? Did it work for you?  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to use the new cached function but it didn&#8217;t work.  Did you try using it? Did it work for you?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3315</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hari,

There are ways to remove outdated content from Google&#039;s cache. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;process to do so depends on whether you&#039;re the site owner or not&lt;/a&gt;.  

If you are the site owner, here&#039;s how you would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1663660&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remove a cached version of a page&lt;/a&gt;. If you are &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; the site owner, you would&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1663691&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; follow this process to request the removal&lt;/a&gt;.

I hope this helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hari,</p>
<p>There are ways to remove outdated content from Google&#8217;s cache. The <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" rel="nofollow">process to do so depends on whether you&#8217;re the site owner or not</a>.  </p>
<p>If you are the site owner, here&#8217;s how you would <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1663660" rel="nofollow">remove a cached version of a page</a>. If you are <strong>not</strong> the site owner, you would<a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1663691" rel="nofollow"> follow this process to request the removal</a>.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron,

Thanks for your comment and insight about the Instant Preview. I&#039;ve run some other tests that would support your own personal behavior. In general I believe most users are scanning the page and looking primarily at the title as an indicator of relevance. The Instant Preview feels like an advanced feature for a sub-set of users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and insight about the Instant Preview. I&#8217;ve run some other tests that would support your own personal behavior. In general I believe most users are scanning the page and looking primarily at the title as an indicator of relevance. The Instant Preview feels like an advanced feature for a sub-set of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hari</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>hari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hai , im hari  ..i have deleted my postings . but still its not getting out of cache in google 

the web is   http://www.59services.com/comment/40

and the cached url is &quot;http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DM6n_5CzItEJ:www.59services.com/comment/40+xchanging+chennai&amp;cd=9&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=in&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai , im hari  ..i have deleted my postings . but still its not getting out of cache in google </p>
<p>the web is   <a href="http://www.59services.com/comment/40" rel="nofollow">http://www.59services.com/comment/40</a></p>
<p>and the cached url is &#8220;http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DM6n_5CzItEJ:www.59services.com/comment/40+xchanging+chennai&amp;cd=9&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=in&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/google-cached-pages-gone#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5443#comment-3283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AJ,
Good point about why they might have moved it. If they figured that a large amount of people weren&#039;t using them, might as well keep them out of view so the page doesn&#039;t look cluttered as well as any extra bandwidth that it was using.

I will say, I very rarely use the Instant preview. My feeling is, if I cant find what I am looking for from the title and description, im not clicking. As far as the preview goes, I usually just assume its not going to be very good
Aaron Friedman
@aaronfriedman]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ,<br />
Good point about why they might have moved it. If they figured that a large amount of people weren&#8217;t using them, might as well keep them out of view so the page doesn&#8217;t look cluttered as well as any extra bandwidth that it was using.</p>
<p>I will say, I very rarely use the Instant preview. My feeling is, if I cant find what I am looking for from the title and description, im not clicking. As far as the preview goes, I usually just assume its not going to be very good<br />
Aaron Friedman<br />
@aaronfriedman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.blindfiveyearold.com @ 2013-06-19 03:31:03 by W3 Total Cache -->