<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cut Up Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cut-up-learning</link>
	<description>SEO, SEM, Marketing and Technology sprinkled with Sports, Parenting and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Why are Online Game Sites Always Just The Same Old Playable Games? &#171; Laurent Courtines WordPressing</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>Why are Online Game Sites Always Just The Same Old Playable Games? &#171; Laurent Courtines WordPressing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-3170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read a blog post about content curation problem of the web that referred to W.S.Burrough&#039;s Cut Up Technique and that led me down a path of questioning why all flash game sites only have games?    It would [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a blog post about content curation problem of the web that referred to W.S.Burrough&#039;s Cut Up Technique and that led me down a path of questioning why all flash game sites only have games?    It would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Robison+</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Robison+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-2947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think about this idea all the time. How much time are we spending searching through the vast amount of content out there vs. how much content are we producing ourselves. I think with so much information at our fingertips it makes it so easy for us to just be consuming machines and easily get distracted without creating our own work. Of course bloggers like you have cut through the information paralysis and you are inspired to blog your own ideas, but a lot of us get too caught up in reading! I think with every great advancement like the abundance of material out there comes a new challenge for us to practice self control and time management and focus on what&#039;s really important for our business and personal growth. Great analysis!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think about this idea all the time. How much time are we spending searching through the vast amount of content out there vs. how much content are we producing ourselves. I think with so much information at our fingertips it makes it so easy for us to just be consuming machines and easily get distracted without creating our own work. Of course bloggers like you have cut through the information paralysis and you are inspired to blog your own ideas, but a lot of us get too caught up in reading! I think with every great advancement like the abundance of material out there comes a new challenge for us to practice self control and time management and focus on what&#8217;s really important for our business and personal growth. Great analysis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-2842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Rick. 

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s different for everyone, but we have so many sources of information coming at us. I make myself more available to them, yes, but even if I didn&#039;t you still have email, TV, radio, phones, tablets, books, music and the Internet. So even if you&#039;re not seeking it out, I think it&#039;s finding us and as such we&#039;re integrating it into how we live and learn. Me, I&#039;m an &#039;Info Freako&#039; and go out of my way to marinate in it all.

As for authorship in comments. That&#039;s an interesting question. I don&#039;t think Google supports fractional authorship on one piece of content. How it will deal with it when validating via the Rich Snippets Testing Tool ... well, lets find out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rick. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s different for everyone, but we have so many sources of information coming at us. I make myself more available to them, yes, but even if I didn&#8217;t you still have email, TV, radio, phones, tablets, books, music and the Internet. So even if you&#8217;re not seeking it out, I think it&#8217;s finding us and as such we&#8217;re integrating it into how we live and learn. Me, I&#8217;m an &#8216;Info Freako&#8217; and go out of my way to marinate in it all.</p>
<p>As for authorship in comments. That&#8217;s an interesting question. I don&#8217;t think Google supports fractional authorship on one piece of content. How it will deal with it when validating via the Rich Snippets Testing Tool &#8230; well, lets find out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bucich+</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bucich+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-2841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good read AJ!

I&#039;m still finding a happy medium. Facebook surely isn&#039;t it, the fact that carriage return submits a comment ensures the brief Twitter like response.

So far, Twitter search and G+ are my primary resources for content discovery. Been a fan of Google Reader Play for a long time but that content is now very similar to what I see on G+.

Side note, what happens to authorship if I apply the appropriate code as I have in the signature here? Just food for thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read AJ!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still finding a happy medium. Facebook surely isn&#8217;t it, the fact that carriage return submits a comment ensures the brief Twitter like response.</p>
<p>So far, Twitter search and G+ are my primary resources for content discovery. Been a fan of Google Reader Play for a long time but that content is now very similar to what I see on G+.</p>
<p>Side note, what happens to authorship if I apply the appropriate code as I have in the signature here? Just food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-2809</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-2809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will,

Thanks for stopping in and leaving a thoughtful comment. As I mentioned, I want services like KAI and others to succeed. In fact, I think for some users they probably do a decent job. And with some tweaks maybe they could be a more effective tool for my own type of information consumption.

I might be an outlier or perhaps the canary in the coal mine. I&#039;m not sure which. I spend &lt;strong&gt;way&lt;/strong&gt; more than 10 minutes a day consuming information. Part of the reason why is that I&#039;ve seen clear benefits in doing so. That, and I enjoy it.  Again, that might make me unusual, but I think people are learning how to process the accelerated flow of information. 

An improvement (for me) would be far more diversity, to go beyond my social graph (no matter how many levels you&#039;re following) and follow the links within some of those articles, or to map the engagement graph through those who have commented, shared or bookmarked that piece of content. Follow the conversations to multiple platforms. What do those people look like? What are they reading? 

But there&#039;s also a fundamental difference (which I&#039;m not sure I communicated well enough in my post) which is the the non-linear nature and juxtaposition of content that can produce different insight. Services like KAI would be hard pressed to insert what seemed like random things into those updates.

These could be images (&lt;em&gt;perhaps&lt;/em&gt; you could map a service like Pinterest), songs (&lt;em&gt;perhaps&lt;/em&gt; you could tap into Spotify), videos, books or even food. I&#039;m reminded of the back of Wired Magazine where they&#039;d list the songs that helped get that issue out along with food and drugs of choice. (I&#039;m not sure they do this anymore.) I was always interested in what they listened to because it would clearly influence how that issue was produced. 

The type of cut-up method I describe transforms things. So my recollection of the 80s game Simon might encourage me to think about design and UX in a sightly different way that day. So perhaps I&#039;m being too harsh on services like KAI. They do what they&#039;re supposed to do and have a place in the ecosystem. In the end, I think I see them more as a piece to a greater solution rather than the solution itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping in and leaving a thoughtful comment. As I mentioned, I want services like KAI and others to succeed. In fact, I think for some users they probably do a decent job. And with some tweaks maybe they could be a more effective tool for my own type of information consumption.</p>
<p>I might be an outlier or perhaps the canary in the coal mine. I&#8217;m not sure which. I spend <strong>way</strong> more than 10 minutes a day consuming information. Part of the reason why is that I&#8217;ve seen clear benefits in doing so. That, and I enjoy it.  Again, that might make me unusual, but I think people are learning how to process the accelerated flow of information. </p>
<p>An improvement (for me) would be far more diversity, to go beyond my social graph (no matter how many levels you&#8217;re following) and follow the links within some of those articles, or to map the engagement graph through those who have commented, shared or bookmarked that piece of content. Follow the conversations to multiple platforms. What do those people look like? What are they reading? </p>
<p>But there&#8217;s also a fundamental difference (which I&#8217;m not sure I communicated well enough in my post) which is the the non-linear nature and juxtaposition of content that can produce different insight. Services like KAI would be hard pressed to insert what seemed like random things into those updates.</p>
<p>These could be images (<em>perhaps</em> you could map a service like Pinterest), songs (<em>perhaps</em> you could tap into Spotify), videos, books or even food. I&#8217;m reminded of the back of Wired Magazine where they&#8217;d list the songs that helped get that issue out along with food and drugs of choice. (I&#8217;m not sure they do this anymore.) I was always interested in what they listened to because it would clearly influence how that issue was produced. </p>
<p>The type of cut-up method I describe transforms things. So my recollection of the 80s game Simon might encourage me to think about design and UX in a sightly different way that day. So perhaps I&#8217;m being too harsh on services like KAI. They do what they&#8217;re supposed to do and have a place in the ecosystem. In the end, I think I see them more as a piece to a greater solution rather than the solution itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/cut-up-learning#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 05:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/?p=5294#comment-2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really interesting post AJ.  Working at Know About It we think about these points everyday, and the echo chamber is something we are trying to avoid at all costs.  For instance, we only recently added in Popular as a view into your social streams.  The reason:  this is the content you are most likely to see anyway.  Popular serves a purpose for those times when you are completely unplugged (which could include simply going to sleep) or otherwise preoccupied and away from your normal news consumption cycle.  

However, what we&#039;ve focused on more from the beginning is what you are most likely missing.  This includes personalized content through recommendations, content from quiet people (hidden gems section) and different media types.  This is our first attempt at avoiding the echo chamber.

Lastly, your process of skimming headlines may be effective in surfacing only that content your likely to care about, but I&#039;ve found it takes too much damn time.  If it takes you 10 minutes to scan articles in order to read 5 minutes worth of content, I&#039;d like to reverse that ratio for you.  It&#039;s not about filtering out data, it&#039;s about resorting it in a way that is likely to save you time.  It&#039;s all still there, just organized outside of realtime.

Thanks again for the post.  And even though KAI isn&#039;t solving your overload problem yet, we&#039;ll get there =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post AJ.  Working at Know About It we think about these points everyday, and the echo chamber is something we are trying to avoid at all costs.  For instance, we only recently added in Popular as a view into your social streams.  The reason:  this is the content you are most likely to see anyway.  Popular serves a purpose for those times when you are completely unplugged (which could include simply going to sleep) or otherwise preoccupied and away from your normal news consumption cycle.  </p>
<p>However, what we&#8217;ve focused on more from the beginning is what you are most likely missing.  This includes personalized content through recommendations, content from quiet people (hidden gems section) and different media types.  This is our first attempt at avoiding the echo chamber.</p>
<p>Lastly, your process of skimming headlines may be effective in surfacing only that content your likely to care about, but I&#8217;ve found it takes too much damn time.  If it takes you 10 minutes to scan articles in order to read 5 minutes worth of content, I&#8217;d like to reverse that ratio for you.  It&#8217;s not about filtering out data, it&#8217;s about resorting it in a way that is likely to save you time.  It&#8217;s all still there, just organized outside of realtime.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the post.  And even though KAI isn&#8217;t solving your overload problem yet, we&#8217;ll get there =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.blindfiveyearold.com @ 2013-06-18 21:22:38 by W3 Total Cache -->